enrich.so is a larger, more established data platform. Here's how the two actually differ — pricing model, plan structure, and what each plan actually gets you — not performance claims we haven't earned yet.
| Fyonta | enrich.so | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat monthly fee, no credits | Credit-based (pay per successful result) |
| Entry plan | $99/mo | $49/mo (100,000 credits) |
| Top plan | $499/mo | $499/mo (2,500,000 credits) |
| Email lookups, entry plan | No monthly cap | 10,000 / month |
| Email lookups, top plan | No monthly cap | 250,000 / month |
| Rate limit, entry plan | 200 req/min | 300 req/min sustained |
| Rate limit, top plan | 1,000 req/min | 5,000 req/min sustained |
| Usage tracking required | No — flat fee regardless of volume within your rate limit | Yes — different operations cost different credit amounts |
| MCP server included | Yes, every plan | Yes, every plan |
| Owned database + live enrichment | Yes, one API surface for both | Yes |
| Company age | New — launched 2026 | Established, VC-backed |
Where the email-lookup numbers come from: enrich.so's own pricing page prices Email Finder at 10 credits per successful match. A Growth plan ($49/mo) has 100,000 credits, which is exactly 10,000 email lookups a month before you'd need to buy more credits or upgrade — that 10,000 figure is their own published number, not our estimate. Scale ($149/mo, 500,000 credits) works out to 50,000 emails; Pro ($499/mo, 2,500,000 credits) works out to 250,000. Every other operation — phone lookups at 500 credits, company data at 25–100 credits — draws from the same pool, so your real email quota is lower than the numbers above the moment you use credits for anything else.
Fyonta doesn't meter by result. There's no credit balance to watch and no other operation competing for the same pool — your ceiling is the request-rate limit (200 or 1,000/min), not a shrinking number of lookups.
Why we're not claiming a higher match rate or faster response time: we haven't published those numbers because we don't have the volume of independently-verified data yet to back them honestly. enrich.so publishes theirs; we'd rather earn ours than assert them.